Should There Be Laws For Graffiti?

Angela Xiao (9) | STAFF REPORTER

Graffiti’s two sides of a coin can be seen as art or vandalism. While many may disapprove of this artform, it can also be used as an artistic expression for beauty, to convey messages, or for protests. Most times, this artform is done illegally and without permission; however, Graffiti should most definitely be allowed — just to a certain extent.

Graffiti originated in New York during the 1970s, and it can be seen as an artistic way to challenge authorities or to voice opinions (especially on political views). There is a sort of art and beauty to its unwavering fight for expression, which makes it a powerful artform in our present day. Therefore, the areas for graffiti should not be totally restricted, but there should certainly be limits and boundaries. Many private properties should be off limits, and if unauthorized graffiti were to appear there, there should be consequences. There should also be certain areas where graffiti should be allowed so the artist still has a choice for the placement of their art.

There is always a way for art and the law to coexist despite their extreme differences. With the help of all individuals and certain laws, graffiti can be done in a way where vandalism is not the outcome but rather art and beauty of expression.