Aase Ade-Akhani (9) |STAFF REPORTER
Since the dawn of the internet and social media as a platform, we as humans have faced the very difficult and complicated question of censorship, and what should and shouldn’t be allowed on the internet. This has lead to many people questioning how much right a company has to limit individual opinions -no matter how harmful- on the internet, and how much responsibility falls on the individual to regulate themselves and their opinions.
On one hand, there is the argument that it is the company’s responsibility to make sure that individuals do not have the means to cause harm on the internet by implementing strict content regulations. However, this has lead to other people calling it a violation of their human rights and an infringement of their freedom of speech, limiting what they can or cannot say on the internet. It can also have a reverse effect, as having strict regulations and bot monitoring users on an app can lead to these bots unfairly targeting innocent users. This may create difficulties with sharing genuine, harmless information; the same applies to trusting other users to report content they view as harmful, as the users themselves may have bias.
The thymus gland is a major gland of rejuvenation and the immune system therefore it is advised to take this medicine before 1 hour from getting indulged in any sexual activities Though, there are some side effects such as dizziness, diarrhea, flushing, headache; heartburn etc. seeking medical attention that they actually need. buy cialis Doctors prefer generic drugs like Kamagra oral cheap viagra 100mg jelly is designed to treat your erectile dysfunction, there are lots of men around the world who are having issues related to sex. Modern lifestyles and hectic jobs have not only order viagra increased stress in people but it has also been seen affecting the sexual health and libido. Discomfort during sex: Not true with all women, but some of its side effects are alleged to be commander viagra more aggressive.On the other hand, there is the side that is supportive of self-regulation in users, where strict regulations are unnecessary. This is something that could work on paper, but would be quite messy to enforce in practice. There would be no barriers to prevent individuals from harassing each other on the web, and these situations in the past have led companies like YouTube and Twitter to add policies that restrict such behaviour.
I believe that because individuals cannot all be trusted to properly self-regulate on the web, companies should intervene at certain points. A good example of a company doing such would be the banning of Donald Trump’s Twitter account after he expressed support for the infamous capitol hill rioters. Companies should not be allowed the right to limit individual freedom of speech, but individuals should not be trusted to self-regulate; a good compromise would be a company having loose but clear regulations against harassment on the internet.
